Reasoning About Competitive Reactions: Evidence from Executives
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Temporal abductive reasoning about biochemical reactions
The interactions among the components of a biological system can be given a logical representation that is useful for reasoning about them. One of the relevant problems that may be raised in this context is finding what would explain a given behaviour of some component; in other terms, generating hypotheses that, when added to the logical theory modeling the system, imply that behaviour. Tempor...
متن کاملReasoning about Complementary Intrusion Evidence
This paper presents techniques to integrate and reason about complementary intrusion evidence such as intrusion alerts generated by intrusion detection systems (IDSs) and reports by system monitoring or vulnerability scanning tools. To facilitate the modeling of intrusion evidence, this paper classifies intrusion evidence into either event-based evidence or state-based evidence. Event-based evi...
متن کاملAnchored Narratives in Reasoning about Evidence
This paper concerns the reasoning with stories, evidence and generalisations in a legal context. We will make some notions from the existing Anchored Narratives theory more clear by making use of two formal techniques from AI, namely causal-abductive reasoning and default-style argumentation. We will propose a combination of these two formalisms which solves some of the problems of the causal-a...
متن کاملReasoning About Diverse Evidence in Preference Predictions
People often incorporate the opinions of others to make predictions about the world, including their preferences for novel experiences and items. In two experiments, we explored how people use the opinions of dissimilar others in making such predictions. While social cognition research has found that similar others tend to influence our judgments more than dissimilar others, the diversity princ...
متن کاملCommon Knowledge in Legal Reasoning about Evidence
It is shown how tools of argument analysis currently being developed in artificial intelligence can be applied to legal judgments about evidence based on common knowledge. Chains of reasoning containing generalizations and implicit premises that express common knowledge are modeled using argument diagrams and argumentation schemes. A controversial thesis is argued for. It is the thesis that suc...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Marketing Science
سال: 2005
ISSN: 0732-2399,1526-548X
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1040.0076